Skip to content

FAQ & troubleshooting

A site got the “Needs attention” verdict — what does it mean?

Section titled “A site got the “Needs attention” verdict — what does it mean?”

The scanner could not read the site properly. Two typical causes (shown as diagnostic flags in the site list):

  • An SPA site — pages are assembled by JavaScript in the browser, and the server HTML contains almost no text. The scanner works with server-rendered HTML, so such a site looks “empty”. Full JS rendering is on the roadmap; for now such sites should be checked manually.
  • robots.txt restrictions — the site forbids robot crawling, and the scanner respects that.

The site status “Needs attention” can also be used manually — as a “look into this” mark for colleagues.

Too many false positives — how do I silence them?

Section titled “Too many false positives — how do I silence them?”

In order of effectiveness:

  1. A skip-rule — when the phrase legitimately appears on the site (classics: “whiskey” in a coffee syrup, “cocaine” in the Franck Boclet perfume name). Created in one click from the alert page (“More → Add skip-rule”); by default it applies to this site only.
  2. The “False positive” status — for one-off cases; false-positive statistics help clean up stop lists.
  3. Refine the stop list — an overly generic phrase is better replaced with a more specific one.
  4. “Clear false positives” on the site — bulk-removes already marked false alerts.

On the Premium plan, run “Classify with AI” before manual review — the model proposes a verdict based on context.

I can see a violation on the site but the scanner didn’t find it. Why?

Section titled “I can see a violation on the site but the scanner didn’t find it. Why?”

Check in order:

  • The phrase is not in the stop lists — the scanner only finds what is listed (exact, morphology-aware matches). Semantic “by meaning” search works on Premium only.
  • The page was not crawled — plans have page and depth limits; a very large catalogue may not be covered fully. Sections listed in sitemap.xml are discovered best.
  • The text is in an image — OCR is out of the system’s scope.
  • The content is rendered by JavaScript — see the SPA question above.
  • The site may have changed after the last scan — run “Re-scan”.

The “Scanning…” badge has been showing for a long time — is that normal?

Section titled “The “Scanning…” badge has been showing for a long time — is that normal?”

Crawling a large site takes time: the scanner pauses between requests to the same domain to avoid loading the merchant’s site. The badge clears automatically when the scan finishes; if it stays longer than ~30 minutes, the crawl probably aborted — run “Re-scan” or contact support.

Per the frequency in the site form: daily / weekly / monthly, or “Auto” — by the merchant’s risk level (high — daily, medium — weekly, low — monthly). For “Auto” without a computed risk, the organisation’s default frequency applies. An out-of-schedule scan — the “Re-scan” action at any time.

A colleague did not receive the invitation email

Section titled “A colleague did not receive the invitation email”
  1. Check the spam folder and the email address in the user’s card.
  2. The link is valid for 72 hours — when expired, use “Resend invitation”.
  3. If email doesn’t reach the employee at all — the “Copy invitation link” action in the user list: hand the link over via any channel.

Check the Notification email in “Administration → Settings” — violation emails go to that address (not to individual users). In-app notifications (the bell) reach all officers and administrators of the organisation after every scan with new alerts.

The two-factor authentication code is not arriving

Section titled “The two-factor authentication code is not arriving”

The code is sent to the account email and is valid for a few minutes. Check spam; if there is no code, request it again from the sign-in screen. As a last resort the administrator can temporarily disable 2FA in the user’s card.

How do I prove a violation to a card scheme?

Section titled “How do I prove a violation to a card scheme?”

Every alert has immutable evidence: a snapshot of the page text (and a screenshot on Premium) tied to the scan moment — later scans never overwrite them. For handover: the “PDF report” on an alert, Excel export from the alert list, the Underwriting case PDF report.

Why can’t I see the “Settings” / “Users” sections?

Section titled “Why can’t I see the “Settings” / “Users” sections?”

They are only available to the Administrator role. A compliance officer works on review and cases, an auditor only reads. If you need access — ask your organisation’s administrator (roles in detail).